The Industrial Software space continues to outgrow its labels!!!!

As the 2014 draws to a close, I seem to be sitting in a growing amount of long term strategic meetings both within Schneider-Electric and within customers and discussing the landscape of 2020 -2025. What immediately happens is the labels we have used for years for products, spaces, and roles no longer mean the same thing. We rapidly find ourselves setting up a glossary of labels and what they will mean in 2020-25 in order to gain alignment.

Putting a label on this space has been challenging because it has evolved over the last 20 years and will continue to change as many technologies converge towards an integrated industrial software platform strategy.

1990 - 2010: The label “MES” was first introduced in 1990 to refer to a point application at a single site (typically Quality Management). Over the next 20 years, more functionality was added to MES to keep pace with Automation trends.

2010-2015: In recognizing its evolution, some industry analysts have offered new acronyms like MOM (LNS Research), while others have redefined MES as follows:

“For many, MES is no longer a point application, but a platform that serves a dual purpose: integrating multiple business processes within a site and across the manufacturing network, and creating an enterprise manufacturing execution capability.”

-          Gartner Group, Vendor Guide for MES 2012

Today/Tomorrow: As the industrial computing paradigm shifts to the internet, the platform is now being leveraged for other assets distributed across the interconnected value chain while extending the rich optimization functionality via new applications to get more productivity in areas outside of manufacturing. This platform maybe on premise but is rapidly growing to been a hybrid of on premise and “off premise” (cloud) solutions that enabled the shift to “managed Solutions” with standards. Required to gain consistency, and transparency across the value generating assets.

We started to see this transformation in early 2000s when a simple activity such as Performance /OEE on a packaging line became dramatically more complex. A different solution when it went from one line to many lines on a plant, and then the same standards, downtime reasons across 100s of lines over multiple plants. It was then that I realized in the meetings internally I could not use the word MES generically and needed to become specific.

Another area we finding this is around the HMI (human machine interface) traditionally it was a window into my process/ PLC and that is what InTouch was famous for. Again in internal meetings and with customers I struggle when they use the term as we have completely different functions in the operational experience been referred too. The diagram below shows the landscape we face in Operational Experiences today in a typical industrial company; they are all often referred to as HMI.

Just last we in a design meeting we were defining the strategy for certain notifications to brought to attention. The architectural suggestion was to have the advanced asset application send events to platform alarm and event system; this will expose them across the enterprise. This is the correct answer, but people struggled with it as they had in their mind HMI/ Supervisory, yet when defining the approach I was not thinking supervisory. I was thinking roles and that operational planning, asset planning roles require these notifications. By putting them on the common event bus, they could be picked up their interface which is filtered for these events, or by workflow so that procedure who notify them.

Again it was simple case of labels and peoples understanding of labels, when we ended up on the white board it all became clear.  

  

In the diagram above a Process HMI is a basic screen with alarms typical of InTouch, this very different to Site based system which requires process awareness, alarms, but operational data such as asset state, production schedule, log books etc.

 It is much easier to avoid labels and define the situation. scenario / role, and start the meeting or strategy session laying out the landscape for discussion, gain alignment on the “desired outcome” and destination first, it makes it easier!!!!

Momentum grows on Internet of Things in Industrial and Manufacturing Environment

As I enter another week of brainstorming workshops across Schneider Software, with thought leaders, we are working through innovations on technology, architecture and process. Centered around the “cloud” and “Internet of things” while we have offerings happening in both areas, we need shift from offerings to these technologies be a natural part of the industrial architecture and process of buying and applying an industrial solution. I also spoke with many people over the last 2 weeks across the world not about technology but about the solution challengers and it was clear that the three main challengers kept coming up:

•  People and operational change of moving to teams which involved remote workers and virtual experts
•  Agility to change production, and process quickly and efficiently
•  Holistic control across the manufacturing industrial assets. This required the expansion to   assets that could be mobile or remote to traditional industrial plant, yet still are apart of Value Chain that they are accountable.

Accountability came up over and over again; this means different things from a safety of people to food safety so trace ability etc to efficiency and responsibility to the environment and impact. It was clear in all the discussions that a change in thinking of architecture and approach was needed but instead of its being a “dream” it is really possible today in a sustainable way using such technologies as Cloud and Internet of Things. The architecture below is an example of distributed, but needing a unified operational experience across roles across devices, and unifying devices.

Also during the week I came across two articles one from Microsoft and another from ARC on Hanover fair both supporting the increased momentum in the market for Internet of Things.

Key as MS  points out below the opportunity to investigate and improve your business by naturally looking beyond the traditional architectures, overcoming the concerns such as security, by implementing secure architectures and approaches “that does not mean isolation”.   

The Operational Transformation is here from a design point of view, again this is one of the technologies and approaches to be employed to achieve the operational workspace and efficiency required in the flat world.